The EOS 1000D is remarkably similar in
appearance to its marginally larger relative - the 450D. The basic shape
is pretty much identical, although you will be able to spot some minor
differences if you look closely enough. The hand grip on the front of
the camera, which is rubberized on the 450D, is made of a finely
textured plastic and does not feature an integrated IR sensor - there is
no IR remote available for the 1000D.
On the back of the camera the smaller size of the screen (2.5" vs 3.0" on the 450D) is the most obvious difference but upon closer inspection you'll also find that the 450D's rubberized thumb grip has not made it onto the 1000D body. Despite of the smaller screen (and therefore more space on the camera back) the 1000D's button layout is identical to the 450D's.
On the back of the camera the smaller size of the screen (2.5" vs 3.0" on the 450D) is the most obvious difference but upon closer inspection you'll also find that the 450D's rubberized thumb grip has not made it onto the 1000D body. Despite of the smaller screen (and therefore more space on the camera back) the 1000D's button layout is identical to the 450D's.
Construction
The EOS 1000D's construction and build quality
feels almost exactly identical to the 450D's. The 1000D is primarily
made from three materials; a stainless steel chassis (blue in this
diagram), the mirror box which is made of high-strength 'engineering
plastic' (red in the diagram) and the body made of a special
lightweight 'engineering plastic' which also provides some
electromagnetic shielding. Construction is very good (considering the
budget price) with no creaks or rattles. (Diagram provided by Canon,
our colorization).
In your hand / grip
The body design and and button layout are
almost identical to the 450D, so it does not come as a surprise that the
camera feels almost the same in your hand. The camera as a whole and
the grip in particular can feel a little small in large hands. The lack
of a thumb grip on the camera back is not a big issue although it makes
the camera feel a little more 'plasticy.'
It also retains one of the least
conveniently-placed exposure compensation buttons of any system. As soon
as you want to get involved in what the camera is doing, EV comp
becomes the second-most important button after the shutter button
itself. As with many previous baby Canons, it's placed too near to the
viewfinder to allow it to be easily pressed with the camera to your eye,
especially if you wear glasses.
Side by side
Below you can see how the EOS 1000D shapes up to
some of its competition and its closest relatives in the EOS family.
Dimensionally the differences in the entry level segment are pretty
small: the Olympus E-420 is the shallowest and the Nikon D60 the
narrowest, but we're splitting hairs and talking about millimeters.
Weight-wise the E-420 is quite a bit lighter than the 1000D and D60 but
dimensionally all these cameras play in the same league apart from,
obviously, the Canon 40D which is a different class of camera
altogether.
| Camera | Dimensions (W x H x D) |
Body weight (inc. battery & card) |
|---|---|---|
| Canon EOS 1000D | 126 x 98 x 62 mm (5.0 x 3.8 x 2.4 in) | 502 g (1.1 lb) |
| Canon EOS 450D | 129 x 98 x 62 mm (5.1 x 3.9 x 2.4 in) | 524 g (1.2 lb) |
| Canon EOS40D | 146 x 108 x 74 mm(5.7 x 4.2 x 2.9 in) | 822 g (1.8 lb) |
| Canon EOS 400D | 127 x 94 x 65 mm (5.0 x 3.7 x 2.5 in) | 556 g (1.2 lb) |
| Olympus E-420 | 130 x 91 x 53 mm (5.1 x 3.6 x 2.1 in) | 436 g (1.0 lb) |
| Nikon D60 | 126 x 94 x 64 mm (5.0 x 3.7 x 2.5 in) | 536 g (1.2 lb) |
No comments:
Post a Comment
ඔයාලගේ අදහස් ලියල යන එක මට කරන ලොකු උදව්වක්